On Tuesday, the White House released an executive order resuming the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program.
Latest in Travel Ban
The Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit's decision in Hawaii v. Trump and remanded it with orders to dismiss as moot.
Last week's temporary restraining order in Hawaii v. Trump is a thorough application of the Ninth Circuit's previous ruling in that case. But if the Supreme Court vacates the Ninth Circuit precedent, as many expect it to do shortly, the restraining order will be on weaker footing.
A summary of the October 17, 2017 Maryland District Court preliminary injunction of Trump’s latest travel ban, Presidential Proclamation 9645.
On October 17, Judge Derrick Watson of the federal district court in Hawaii issued a nationwide temporary restraining order (TRO) against the enforcement of sections of President Trump’s third executive order on immigration. This is our summary of that judicial order.
Judge Derrick Watson is right to issue a temporary restraining order in Hawaii v. Trump: The newest travel ban violates the Immigration and Nationality Act’s text, structure, and purpose.
The Supreme Court’s vacatur concludes Trump v. IRAP without spectacle.
As the lower courts take up the new challenges to President Trump’s September 24 proclamation, there is one argument that they should not accept: national security exceptionalism.
Cabinet-level officials should declare under oath that the process leading to the latest iteration of the ban did not have any pre-ordained outcomes.
Trump seems to know at some level that his latest travel ban is the walked-backed, stale leftovers of yesterday’s national security demagoguery.