Terrorism Trials: Legislative Development

Latest in Terrorism Trials: Legislative Development

Appropriations

Omnibus Bill Creates One Billion Dollar Fund for Victims of Terrorism (and allows up to $250 million to go to their attorneys)

The recently signed Omnibus creates the United States Victims of State Sponsors of Terrorism Fund. It allows victims' attorneys to collect a $250 million dollar windfall, a surprising earmark from a Republican-controlled Congress.

Terrorism Trials: Legislative Development: Article III Courts

Toward a Coherent Theory of the “Military Exception” to Article III

My very first Lawfare post, back in December 2011, focused on the messy constitutional question raised by United States v. Ali—a case then pending before the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces that raised the constitutionality of subjecting civilian military contractors to military, rather than civilian, trials.

Terrorism Trials: Civilian Court

The President's Speech: A Quick and Dirty Reaction--Part 2 (Guantanamo)

President Obama made two important announcements about aspects of Guantanamo and its detainees in his speech today. These are worth flagging before I pivot and harp on the big problem with the President's comments about the base and those held there.

The first important announcement came in this paragraph:

International Law: LOAC: Detention

Look Who Has Discovered Inherent Presidential Powers

Hmmmm.

From Harold Koh's speech to the Oxford Union: Congressional transfer restrictions with respect to Guantanamo detainees "must be construed in light of the President’s authority as commander-in chief to regulate the movement of law-of-war detainees, as diplomat-in-chief  to arrange diplomatic transfers, and as prosecutor-in-chief to determine who should be prosecuted and where."

Terrorism Trials & Investigations

Domestic Military Detention After the (New) Feinstein Amendment

Wells is exactly right--and Senators Levin and Graham are exactly wrong--about the implications of last night's Senate vote approving Senator Feinstein's amendment to the FY2013 National Defense Authorization Act. Wells linked to the amendment, but here is the relevant language of what would be new 18 U.S.C. § 4001(b):

Detention: Law of

The Implications of Hamdan II for Bahlul

Today, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit filed a per curiam order in the case of Bahlul v. United States, ordering the parties to file briefs addressing the implications of the court's decision in Hamdan II. The three-judge panel in Bahlul is composed of Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson, Judith Rogers, and David Tatel.

Here's the text of the order:

Criminal Law: Substantive

Could Hamdan Have Been Prosecuted in Federal Court Instead?

[UPDATE: A reader points out that when discussing this subject back in 2011, the question had arisen as to whether this was indeed the best reading of 2339B(d) for the 1996-2004 period.  I had responded that the issue was indeed more complex than I had at first suggested, for the following reason: The actus reus clause of the statute (2339B(a)) was jurisdictionally limited as I suggested, yet there was a separate clause that rather incongruously referred nonetheless to extraterritorial jurisdicti

Detention: Law of: D.C. Circuit Development

Beyond the Battlefield, Beyond al Qaeda: The Destabilizing Legal Architecture of Counterterrorism

I'm happy to report that I've recently completed drafting an article that has been much on my mind for the past few years.  Beyond the Battlefield, Beyond al Qaeda: The Destabilizing Legal Architecture of Counterterrorism (Michigan Law Review, forthcoming 2013) is now posted to SSRN.  In it, I argue that (i) there is a widespread perception that the legal framework for detention and targeting has reached a point of relative stability thanks to a remarkable wave of interbranch and inter-party consensus since 2008; (ii) this facade depends almost

Subscribe to Lawfare

EmailRSSKindle