Summary and analysis of the Fourth Circuit oral argument in International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump.
Latest in Immigration
The judiciary has sought to constrain the executive branch’s civil detention authority under immigration authorities when seeking criminal prosecution of illegal immigrants.
Hawaii v. Trump oral argument in the Ninth Circuit suggests that the case will be heading back to the Supreme Court early next year.
The judiciary appears uncomfortable with a terrorist designation system that the Trump administration has embraced.
All you need to know about an essential aspect of federal immigration enforcement.
The Ninth Circuit held on Thursday that refugees with sponsorship assurances from U.S. resettlement agencies were exempt from President Trump's revised immigration executive order.
Below is an excerpt of a piece that appears on our Foreign Policy feed.
Hawaii District Court Grants in Part Motion to Modify Scope of Preliminary Injunction in Travel Ban Case
The U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii has granted in part the plaintiffs' motion to enforce, or, in the alternative, modify the scope of the preliminary injunction in the travel ban case. The motion came before the court in response to the Trump administration's narrow interpretation of the Supreme Court's per curiam order allowing implementation of the ban.
The order is available in full below.
Donald Trump is missing from the Supreme Court’s per curiam decision granting the U.S. government’s petition for certiorari in the travel ban case and staying in part the relevant injunctions.
Implementing the Refugee EO: The State Department Should Consider Refugee Agency Assurances as Bona Fide Relationships
While progress has been made in implementing the Supreme Court’s stay of lower court injunctions of President Trump’s revised refugee executive order (EO), the State Department’s current stance on refugee admissions requires further review.