Guantanamo: Legislation

Latest in Guantanamo: Legislation

Cyber Threat Intelligence Integration Center (CTIIC)

No CTIIC Meddling Please: Excerpts from White House Veto Threat

Back on June 15, the White House issued a SAP (statement of administration policy) spelling out objections to H.R. 2596, the Intelligence Authorization Act for FY'16.  The SAP concludes that the President will veto the bill if presented as-is.  I thought it worthwhile to highlight the White House objections to those same provisions.

intelligence oversight

Five Important (Or At Least Interesting) Provisions in the Intelligence Authorization Bill HPSCI Passed

The Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016, which HPSCI (the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence) voted out last week, contains a number of very interesting, but little-noticed, provisions. Here are my top-five highlights.

Guantanamo

This Morning's HASC NDAA Markup

A markup of the FY2016 defense bill---which includes, as per usual and among other things, provisions restricting transfers of Guantanamo detainees---will get underway at 10:00 a.m. at the House Armed Services Committee.

Embedded video is below; a copy of the Chairman's mark can be found here.  (Interested readers can find NDAA-related background here, too.)

Guantanamo: Legislation

The Meaningful Legal Differences Between Stateside and Guantánamo Detention

Gabor's post from this morning, which is styled as a response to Ben's thoughtful analysis of what it will take to close Guantánamo (while ignoring some of the other responses), concludes that the only meaningful way to "close" Guantánamo is for President Obama "to either release all detainees or try them in our time-tested federal courts," at least largely because moving the detainees into the United States wou

Detention: Law of

What the Detention Policy Debate Really Is About

Ben bemoans the state our nation’s current debate over Guantanamo as “terrible,” observing that “the arguments about Guantanamo are nearly all wrong, disingenuous, irrelevant, or just plain dumb.”  It’s true that Guantanamo—like most political issues—sometimes takes on a special kind of inside-the-beltway rhetorical flavor that can really annoy the wonks, who would much rather focus on the underlying policy debate.

Subscribe to Lawfare

EmailRSSKindle