The recent ruling by the Eastern District of Virginia in Al Shimari, et. al. v. CACI highlights the need for further guidance from the Supreme Court—or even better, Congress—regarding the scope and nature of the Alien Tort Statute.
Latest in Alien Tort Statute: Litigation
Justice Gorsuch was right about the original meaning of the ATS.
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court denied Mohammed Jawad’s petition for certiorari.
A review of recent updates in the case of Mohammed Jawad, a former Guantanamo detainee who is suing the government over his alleged torture.
The long-running Alien Tort Statute suit against Nestle, Archer Daniels Midland, and Cargill for allegedly aiding and abetting child slave labor in the Cote d’Ivoire—Doe v Nestle—has once again been dismissed.
Last month, the Fifth Circuit issued a split opinion in Adhikari v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., representing the first ATS case to be decided post-RJR Nabisco. The opinion, issued over a vigorous dissent, suggests that it may be premature to say that RJR Nabisco resolves the circuit split over the interpretation of “touch and concern.”
An outline of the legal issues in the D.C. District Court's order in Jawad and Jawad's appellate brief.
At a time of heightened concern over a new wave of terrorism financing threats, the decade-long Arab Bank terrorism financing litigation took another turn this week when the Second Circuit denied several thousand terrorism victims the right to pursue claims against the Jordan-based Arab Bank PLC in U.S. federal court.
A new Alient Tort Statute lawsuit goes after CIA contractor psychologists for helping design and implement the CIA’s “enhanced interrogation techniques.”
Published by Oxford UP (Paperback 2015)
Reviewed by Kenneth Anderson