The answer is probably no. But that's not as obvious as many people seem to think.
Latest in Special Counsel
A storm of tweets on the letter the president's lawyer sent to Congress about Mueller and the transition emails.
Instead of creating new legislation imposing for-cause removal restrictions, Congress should create a mechanism for judicial review of how existing regulations are applied to protect special counsels.
Witness testimony for today's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on proposed legislation to protect special counsels from wrongful termination.
On the Role of Congress and the Courts in the Special Counsel Investigation: A Brief Reply to Rick Pildes
Giving the courts license to adjudicate Robert Mueller's removal would help excuse Congress from confronting its responsibility to exercise the impeachment power—and complicates that exercise.
Senate bills designed to protect special counsel Mueller from removal could do more harm than good.
Codifying the Justice Department’s existing regulations on special counsel does not amount to a return to the old Independent Counsel Act.
Senators have introduced two bills that would create additional protections against the removal of the special counsel.
Congress and the press should be on the lookout for efforts the president and his political allies might take to impede the investigation, short of attempting to fire Mueller.
How can the Acting Attorney General delegate a counterintelligence investigation, as opposed to a criminal investigation, to the Special Counsel?