The Cyberlaw Podcast: What Stephen Paddock Can Tell Us About 702 Reform

By Stewart Baker
Tuesday, October 24, 2017, 6:30 AM

Our interview is another in our series on Section 702 reform, featuring of the National Security Program at Third Way and of George Mason University and IronNet Security.  They begin with the history of the program but quickly focus on proposals to require warrants for FBI criminal searches of already collected 702 data, which Mieke broadly supports and Jamil broadly opposes.  The Las Vegas shooter's case raises the question—are we really going to make the FBI wait for a warrant before checking its own 702 database to see whether Paddock has been in communication with terror groups and what he's been saying? 

In the news roundup, of the Center for Strategic and International Studies and Brian Egan nerd out with me on the DOD's objections to .  Neither Jim nor Brian finds them persuasive.

I give a preview of my plans to celebrate Halloween as a Russian Twitter troll, and Jim predicts that the main fallout from the entirely predictable will be on , as what I call the , already dying abroad starts to look a little here at home.  

Meanwhile, the North Korean hackers are still , semi-successfully.  And, remarkably, they're also finding studios even more willing to cave to cyber blackmail than Sony, as it turns out the hackers apparently killed a they found objectionable. Jim insists that these kinds of attacks tell us more about the calculating rationality of Kim Jong Un than his craziness. And, since Kim's getting away with both, maybe Jim is right.

I riff on the latest in , introducing our audience to an entirely new internet vocabulary.

Also, the medical profession seems to be putting its collective head in the sand about . Jim is sure that liability for producers—and for doctors—will solve that problem before Congress. Knowing the FDA's shaky grasp of the issue, I’m not so sure. 

Finally, Brian reports that the found US data protection practices "adequate" under EU law.  He thinks it's because the administration is taking the EU process seriously; I think it's because the EU is taking President Trump seriously—and has decided he's not someone whose adequacy you want to question lightly. 

As always The Cyberlaw Podcast is open to feedback. Send your questions, suggestions for interview candidates or topics to [email protected] or leave a message at +1 202 862 5785.

.  We are also on , and  (available for Android and Google Chrome)!

The views expressed in this podcast are those of the speakers and do not reflect the opinions of the firm.