The special counsel is right to conduct a financial probe as part of his investigation.
Latest in Robert Mueller
On the Role of Congress and the Courts in the Special Counsel Investigation: A Brief Reply to Rick Pildes
Giving the courts license to adjudicate Robert Mueller's removal would help excuse Congress from confronting its responsibility to exercise the impeachment power—and complicates that exercise.
Senate bills designed to protect special counsel Mueller from removal could do more harm than good.
Codifying the Justice Department’s existing regulations on special counsel does not amount to a return to the old Independent Counsel Act.
The president has just put Robert Mueller on notice of what he has likely long suspected: Mueller may not have much time to complete his investigation.
Congress and the press should be on the lookout for efforts the president and his political allies might take to impede the investigation, short of attempting to fire Mueller.
The president is subject to investigation and, if the evidence supports it, indictment.
Most commentators have assumed that the scope of Robert Mueller's investigation will be governed by the 1999 regulation authorizing the appointment of a “Special Counsel” that was enacted in the wake of the lapse of the independent-counsel statute. But the counterintelligence investigation that Rosenstein appears to have intended to delegate to the Special Counsel is inconsistent with the criminal focus of that regulation.
The President has the power to override the regulation that requires "good cause" to remove special counsel.